
1. A woody, dicot-like plant - maybe arborescent, but more likely a fruticose, shrubby plant of seasonally dry, sub-tropical habitats
2. LEAVES were simple, persisent (evergreen), entire, alternate, pinnately veined, glabrous, and probably stipulate
3. FLOWERS were solitary, terminal, perfect, actinomorphic, with no connation or adnation. The numerous floral parts of this flower were spirally arranged on an elongate floral axis.
PERIANTH: many parted with poor differentiation between appendages of the corolla and calyx (TEPALS)
ANDROECIUM: many stamens that were broad and laminar (no distinct filament)
GYNOECIUM: apocarpous and producing a FOLLICLE
The flowers were probably adapted for insect pollination
(entomophilous), most likely beetles,
as opposed to wind pollination (anemophilous).
Our survey of this basal group will start with the Magnoliales
and touch on representatives of other Orders of the Subclass. The
alignment and sequence of Orders depicted above represents Cronquist's
placement relative to the Magnoliales in terms of structural specializations.
His terminal group - the Papaverales - is made up of herbaceous, syncarpous
plants. Our coverage of the Subclass Magnoliidae will include:
Magnoliales
Winteraceae
Magnoliaceae
Ranunculales
Ranunculaceae
Papaverales
Papaveraceae
Laurales
Lauraceae
Nymphaeales
Nymphaeaceae